Drawing on political science and international relations literature about escalation dynamics, we design a novel wargame simulation and scoring framework to assess the escalation risks of actions taken by these agents in different scenarios. Contrary to prior studies, our research provides both qualitative and quantitative insights and focuses on large language models (LLMs). We find that all five studied off-the-shelf LLMs show forms of escalation and difficult-to-predict escalation patterns. We observe that models tend to develop arms-race dynamics, leading to greater conflict, and in rare cases, even to the deployment of nuclear weapons. Qualitatively, we also collect the models’ reported reasonings for chosen actions and observe worrying justifications based on deterrence and first-strike tactics.
That is from a new paper by Juan-Pablo Rivera, et.al., via the excellent Ethan Mollick. Do note that these recommended tactics are for the U.S., so perhaps the LLMs simply are telling us that America should be more hawkish.
The post Thomas Schelling meets LLMs? appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.
