Unemployment rose to 4.3% in July, up from 4.1% previously, as hiring slowed sharply. The labor market cracks have given sudden urgency to concerns that the Fed has waited too long to begin cutting rates — and that it might be falling behind, allowing the job market to slow in a way that will be hard to stall or reverse.
“They are absolutely behind the curve, and they need to catch up,” said Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives.
High Fed interest rates help to cool inflation by slowing demand. When it costs more to borrow to buy a house or expand a business, people make fewer big purchases, and companies hire fewer workers. As economic activity pulls back, businesses struggle to raise prices as quickly, and inflation moderates.
That chain reaction can come at a serious cost to the job market, though. And once the labor market begins to slow, the cooldown can be difficult to arrest: Economists often say that the unemployment rate shoots up like a rocket and comes down like a feather.
For months now, Fed policymakers have been balancing two big risks. They have been trying to avoid cutting rates too early or too much, allowing the economy to take back off and leaving inflation stuck at an elevated pace. But as inflation has cooled and unemployment has crept higher, officials have been increasingly attuned to the second threat: That they could overdo it by keeping rates too high for too long. That could tip the economy into a severe enough slowdown that it pushes unemployment sharply higher and leaves Americans out of work. Jerome Powell, the Fed’s chair, made it clear this week that not cutting interest rates in July was a challenging judgment call — and that Fed officials would be carefully watching incoming jobs data for any sign that labor conditions were cracking. He suggested that policymakers stood ready to react if they saw evidence that the job market was taking a sudden and unexpected turn for the worse. “I would not like to see material further cooling in the labor market,” Powell said during his news conference after the Fed’s July rate announcement.
Given that, Friday’s job market cooldown could further cement the Fed’s plans to cut interest rates at their next meeting Sept. 18.
It was not clear to what extent Fed officials would see Friday’s report as evidence of painful deterioration. Thomas Barkin, who is the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Virginia, and votes on policy this year, underscored in an interview after the report’s release that the Fed will have another jobs report — for August — before Fed officials will have to make a decision about how to react with monetary policy.
“On unemployment, you have the question of: Is it normalizing, or is it heading toward weakness?” Barkin said. “I think that’s the question we’re going to have to dig into.”
In a Sirius XM interview recorded Friday and set to air fully Monday, Austan Goolsbee, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, sounded wary about the report but also unwilling to react to a single month of data.
“It’s one month’s number; it’s a negative number,” he said, later adding: “This negative number fits into the through line of — hey, better be careful, if you’re going to be as restrictive as we’ve been.”
Wall Street traders seemed to think that the job market slowdown could spur the Fed to make more dramatic rate cuts. After the report, investors sharply bid up the chances that the Fed would make a large half-point interest-rate cut at that September meeting, rather than a standard quarter-point reduction (economists often refer to those increments as 50 basis points and 25 basis points).
“With the benefit of hindsight, it’s easy to say the Fed should have cut this week,” wrote Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at J.P. Morgan. “It’s also easy to say they will cut soon.”
He predicted that the Fed would cut by half a point in both September and November. While that’s more drastic than what some economists are calling for, the idea that central bankers might have to consider a bigger rate cut quickly became widespread.
Blerina Uruci, chief U.S. economist at T. Rowe Price, said that “for the Fed at this point, it seems like this is going to be a decision between 25 and 50,” adding: “It would be aggressive to start the cutting cycle with such a big move; it would be a signal of recognition that they are behind the curve.”
The Fed’s decision about whether to make such a big move will hinge on what happened with the August jobs data, she said. If that report suggests that July’s weakness was overstated, the result of bad weather and other one-off trends, officials may feel more comfortable cutting rates only a normal amount.
“I have my doubts about how much of the weakening represents fundamentals,” Uruci said.
Barkin, for his part, did not sound ready to embrace the prospect of a supersized rate cut. He said that he did not “prejudge” meetings, but he also underscored that the job market was cooling rather than falling apart — hiring might have slowed to 114,000, but that was still a positive number.
“We’re gonna have to see the economy we’ve got when we get to the next meeting and the one after that,” he said. “More significant reductions typically would be associated with an economy that feels like it’s deteriorating rapidly. And again, 114,000 jobs, while not as good as we’ve been running, on a long-term basis, is a reasonable number.”
Still, the report is likely to lend fuel to the Fed’s critics, who have been arguing that with inflation coming under control, monetary policymakers have been moving too slowly toward lower interest rates — and risking the health of the expansion in the process.
Policymakers will sometimes compare their approach to landing a plane: You want to do it completely but gently. But some economists fretted that Friday’s report could be a sign that the landing will be harder and bumpier than hoped.
“I think that when you’re trying to land a plane, you want to pull up before the alarms are going off,” said Nick Bunker, economic research director for North America at Indeed Hiring Lab. The Fed has been waiting to feel very confident that inflation was coming down before cutting interest rates, he said, but they may have bought that confidence at a cost to the job market.
Moving too late could leave officials playing catch-up, some think. While traders previously expected the central bank to cut rates by three-quarters of a point by the end of the year, the odds that they could make a full percentage point of rate cuts increased considerably Friday.
That’s because the Fed’s current rate setting, at 5.3%, is substantially above the level that economists think would weigh on the economy, meaning that policy is effectively tapping the brakes on consumer demand and business hiring. To avoid further cooling the job market, rates might need to be substantially lower.
“You’re not going to stay balanced just by magic — you have to move policy to make that happen,” Coronado said.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
