SCIENCE

Ask Ethan: How can we better measure G, the gravitational constant? | by Ethan Siegel | Starts With A Bang! | Nov, 2025


Press enter or click to view image in full size

This illustration shows NASA’s Gravity Probe B in orbit around the rotating Earth, as well as the warped spacetime that causes the Lense-Thirring effect: an effect not present in Newtonian gravity. Although Einstein’s and Newton’s formalisms for gravity are very different from one another, they both rely on the existence of a universal gravitational constant, G, which is a constant that still remains a challenge to precisely measure. (Credit: NASA)

We first measured G, the gravitational constant, back in the 18th century. As the least well-known fundamental constant, can it be improved?

Our physical universe, to the best of our understanding, can only be made sense of because it always obeys the same fundamental laws: everywhere and at all times. It isn’t just the underlying laws of nature that apply to all physical systems, but a series of fundamental constants as well. Chief among these constants are h, Planck’s constant that governs quantum physics, c, the speed of light in a vacuum that’s the same for all observers, and G, the gravitational constant that was introduced by Newton and that remains, even today, as an inseparable part of Einstein’s field equations in General Relativity.

Even though Newton introduced G in the late 1600s, it wasn’t until 1798 that we were first able to measure it. 200 years later, we realized that many of our claimed refinements were in error, and that our uncertainties were still quite large. Even today, in 2025, G remains one of the least well-known fundamental constants, as the current figure still has a 0.0022% uncertainty on it, while h and c are now defined exactly. Can our understanding of G be improved, and if so…



Source link

MarylandDigitalNews.com